Wednesday, 13 December 2017
Friday, 11 August 2017
Is that actually a thing? GAS? Or is it just something someone came up with that become a buzzword in its own right?
Oooh .. I did not realise I had not posted on my other blogs, namely this one!
Yeah .. once upon a time in a galaxy far, far away I said things were going to change? Well it might have failed to escape everyone's attention that it did not do as I had planned.
In fact everything went all Bjork on my arse .. Oh so quiet!
Then something else happened. Something kinda bad but also kinda unavoidable and I started to state once again that things were going to change.
Would not forgive anyone for thinking .. "Oh here we go again?!"
Yeah well .. no not this time and it just so turns out that a couple of other things are panning out to .. like an old change that was supposed to take place? Yeah that has returned from the grave too.
More will be known about the truth of that in exactly one week from now .. well on here any my other blogs at any rate.
For now I have acquired one .. umm well technically two items that will help me with this blog. Let us say that the outlay required to do this would go along way to show both my commitment and my .. umm .. enthusiasm?
We will see ..
What I have acquired thus far is a car for the first time in years and trust me the outlay as well as the insurance was considerable for me. But it both had to be done and was in the planning for a long, long time.
Then I bought a camera .. that is extremely good in low light as are BOTH the lenses. Both the lenses are top of the line zooms, before you groan .. check them out, and are claimed to be ass good as prime lenses and one of those is 24-70mm f2.8 and of considerable cost.
Though that was not as expensive as the 70-200mm f2.8 zoom with internal focusing.
Even the 1.4x teleconverter most people frown upon sells for like £450!
There are still things to be done and acquired and a battle is about to ensue as I was setting up a business for all this and all m blogs and .. they have reneged on their agreement and are now stabbing me in the back over all this.
I did figure that they might?
It may matter later down the end but then again it may not and it is too difficult to tell right now but a little over a week from now I should know what sort of position I am in.
So then I mentioned a car? A car that might be able to go anywhere, well almost, and that you could set up a tripod and a camera in the back of and shoot photos without getting you or the gear wet? Except .. well the camera and at least one of the lenses is both dust and weatherproof ..
Friday, 28 July 2017
It should have not gone on this long but it did.
There was delay after delay and I am not even sure why, with most if not all of them.
As I stated on my corruption blog .. it will mean some big changes when it occurs and will mean that I can buy a shed load of things that are for professionals, like camera equipment.
But before I could buy anything else I needed something that would help me acquire these other tools, of which there is a long list.
Of course one of the other issues I have had is that I use my mountain bike for a lot of work and .. well the weather has been dreadful for me and my health condition. My condition does not like it when it is hot and humid and it was exactly that of late.
Well .. that is until it turned to rain and last night I could heard this horrendous and loud noise and I thought 'That sounds like really, really heavy rain but that kind of rain I have not witnessed before!'
I got up and looked out my window and I think many local Indian people could be forgiven for thinking they had been teleported back to India in he middle of a monsoon!
Anyway yeah so I needed the bike and as has been the case for years now .. if it is really hot, raining or even just a wind stronger than 10mph then getting anything done wildlife wise, or anything else for that matter .. is impossible!
.. not anymore! (see video below)
As I stated previously .. many tools to come! Lol! Hmm Celestron and a professional DSLT?
I am talking astrophotography but .. well I am probably going to suck but I am a perfectionist so I will never give in until I am doing things perfectly! Lol.
Sunday, 29 May 2016
Of course this involves the aforementioned James Web Space Telescope, JWST, along with a follow up telescope that involves the start shade I mentioned in a previous post.
I pictured doing something very similar in my head, about targeting a start with a powerful telescope and blocking out the light so that any planets reflecting the stars light would show up optically.
I am confused how they did not think if this earlier but was likely down to having the technology. I imagine that one or more scientists had the same idea I did but had to wait until the technology was both possible in theory, then available and finally cheap enough?
An very interesting and in depth talk ...
Thursday, 26 May 2016
I have been well aware of the fact that they have used the dimming effect of stars as their planets are an in transit in relation to our view of the stars and their planets.
I was watching this video on YouTube about Earth like exoplanets and I wondered whether or not something that keeps occurring to me gets mentioned, either by the scientists or some bright spark in the audience.
I am over 48 minutes into watching this talk and it has not occurred yet.
Checking for the dimming effect is great but it cannot rule out the existence of planets because any start you might be looking at may have its planetary orbits perpendicular, or at 90 degrees, to our view of that star and you cannot change that.
The longer it has taken for me to remember to remark about this fact the longer I have gone and the more minutes watched of some episode or other on exoplanet astronomy that it never gets mentioned.
What is exciting though is the things I am hearing about that I was not aware of. I had always found it ridiculous, even as a child, that we could not image the planets. It was always stated that we would not be able to do that and I thought this statement preposterous.
I have often spoken in discussions that with a strong enough telescope you simply need something top block out the light of the actual star itself. A tiny shade.
I then hear that they were creating something like this recently, albeit not tiny at a shade measuring ... hmm was it 30 or 100 metres across? I think it was 100?
Then is saw another short video on YouTube about them coming up with a smaller way of blocking out the stars light.
I had long known about the James Webb Telescope and it turns out there are other things in the pipeline too?!
That is very cool.
I just hope that my sporadic and unpredictable health issues do not prevent me from being around to witness this?
After all I might come back as a religious nut in my next like that has no appreciation for science and astronomy?
Perish the thought.
Thursday, 19 May 2016
I watched a very interesting programme, think it was a National Geographic one, yesterday.
It was about what would happen if a nearby star became a Neutron star and headed into our solar system, though technically it does not even have to be within it to wreak havoc.
A Neutron star is the result of a star going supernova within certain mass parameters. Does not become a brown dwarf after is red giant phase and nor does it become a black hole.
In effect it is one of the ways in which a star is dying, so is a dying star. But its mass has collapsed to such a density, hard to imagine, that it sends out two beams of material extremely high in dangerous particles that are radioactive. Think something that has the same effect as standing next to a nuclear bomb going off but the source that could be hundreds of thousands of miles away.
But the beams go in just two directions so it is possible the beams might miss us, even though a neutron star spins...fast.
Now the programmes itself talk to scientists while having mock ups of what would happen and makes it interesting.
There is a funny part in what happens towards the end regarding one of the ships they built you just have to watch.
I will also add that though they gather scientists and theoretically talk about the possible ways to power a spacecraft, anti-matter or nuclear, I will stress that this is for like ... now!
They also state that they suggest that there would be a 70 to 80 year margin between detection of the oncoming catastrophe and the event taking place. So what you should, or would, happen in those 75 years.
In other words, silly scientists, that they make a big case for how dangerous anti-matter would be but this is if it was to bee discovered imminently.
If, say for argument sake something like this was discovered in 15 to 25 years time ... well ... a lot could have happened technology wise between now and then and there could be come surprise major advancements in handling a material as volatile as anti-matter. Which, to be frank, is about as volatile as they come.
Of course it does not take into account what the military establishments of the world might be hiding by way of technology which could come out of the woodwork and be used?
I would state that I would be quite calm about it all and sensible and I know I would not get onto either ship! And that's OK. Lol.
Still an interesting programme and the first one I ever put in my favourites...
Tuesday, 10 May 2016
Well this is getting both extremely interesting and exciting.
It would appear that the Kepler telescope is now speeding up in its discovery of Earth sized worlds inhabiting other solar systems?
NASA just announced the largest number of discovered worlds, known as Exo planets (extra solar planets), in one announcement than they have since the searches started.
The level of increase is quite something and one cannot help but wonder what the next few announcements will be like?
Then in 2020 we have the James Webb Telescope going into orbit, fingers crossed and provided there are no further delays?
My mind simply liquefies when I try to predict what, or precisely how many, discoveries would have been announced by the time the JWT is in orbit?!
One hundred more Earth sized planets announced in one go. Now just waiting for the spectral interferometer announcements that simply have to come with ever greater detail?
It's always been a theory of mine that life would be found among the stars we could see with our naked eye. But that life that had developed as far as we had our slightly further might be a little further afield than what our eyes can detect without help.
That's always been how I thought it would turn out, even as a child. I never had any doubts life was out there and even had a few ideas of life would have evolved.
I even started writing a sci-fi novel that I managed to plan out over four books. It's rather infamous among friends and family that I reached for chapters in then my life was turned upside down and kept being turned at regular intervals that I never got back to working on.
I still have those five chapters I did write.
I just never got around to adding to them in any way, shape or form. I did, however, make some rough sketches of the spacecraft in the stories.
Maybe one day I will be in a position to go back to them and get them finished?
Hmm, maybe by 2020? Lol, yup that would be kind of fitting ... provided the James Webb Telescope goes to that year and it works?
Once again I have to cross my f.... oh wait? Better crossed my toes?!
Kepler telescope discovers 100 Earth-sized planets - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-36256725